Material Listing

The prevention approaches highlighted in this story provide examples of school-based prevention efforts that include multiple approaches to more comprehensively address risk and protective factors for dating violence among all youth in a school setting.

The prevention approaches highlighted in this story address community conditions that give rise to, protect against, or counter violence in communities and reflect a multi-generational approach that has the potential to create lasting safe, stable, nurturing relationships and environments.

This story features lessons learned from coalitions in California, Delaware, and Michigan whose approaches focused on building a network of partners working collaboratively to support IPV and TDV prevention. 

This story features coalitions in Delaware, North Carolina, and Indiana that implemented approaches in communities experiencing disproportionate trauma as a result of exposure to stressors such as chronic poverty, high rates of violence, and substandard housing.

This story features coalitions in California, Florida, and North Carolina who used policy-based approaches to have a community-level impact on IPV.

This report offers a snapshot of the national prevention landscape, with a particular focus on collaboration and funding.

The National Resource Center on Domestic Violence (NRCDV) strongly disagrees with recent comments made by President Trump suggesting that “a little fight with the wife” should not be treated as a crime.

Developed under the Family Violence Prevention Act, this document offers recommendations for policymakers and practitioners—at all levels—to advance systemic change and improve responses to LGBTQ survivors.

This handout affirms that self-determination is a precondition to safety for domestic violence survivors and urges advocates to prioritize self-determination alongside safety in their support.

This handout highlights the distinctions between community-based domestic violence advocacy and criminal legal responses, so that both advocates and legal professionals can understand these differences and uphold the framework appropriate to their role.